This website is no longer actively maintained
Some material and features may be unavailable
Pivotal Power

November 16, 2009
Obama looks to redefine U.S. relationship with China

Shanghai. Photo: flickr user Furryface

Last week, as he prepared to leave for Asia, President Obama called the U.S. relationship with China a “strategic partnership.” This new label is 100% certain to be met with accusations of appeasement and naivete by the not-always-so-loyal opposition. The neocons didn’t like the concept of “strategic reassurance” that Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg unveiled a few weeks ago, and spoke about at a recent Center for American Progress event, and they are going to like this even less. But using this term before his first visit to China is quite a smart move.

After also calling it a “competitor,” Obama referred to a strategic partnership with China in the context of major transnational threats. China is the world’s largest emitter of carbon, its most dynamic large economy (and owner of some $800 billion in US treasuries) and a nuclear power that neighbors North Korea and buys more oil from Iran than any other country. If China doesn’t become our partner, then we are in trouble.

Unfortunately, China has not been a reliable partner so far on these global challenges. As I detail in a new report, China is very engaged in all the international institutions and diplomacy, and this is a big step in the right direction. But you can count on a couple of fingers the number of times China has taken proactive leadership on a global threat: North Korea (but it took enormous and constant US pressure to get them to lead on the Six Party Talks); and the avian and swine flu pandemics, although its active leadership has consisted of convening international conferences of health experts– important, but not exactly mind-blowing.

In fact, Beijing is not using its leverage with Iran to end its nuclear program; it has so far resisted agreeing to specific targets for its carbon emissions that would make a global deal to address climate change possible; and the steps China is taking to move to a domestic-led growth model that will address global economic imbalances are welcome, but too few and too slow.

What the Chinese will tell you is that they achieve a productive relationship by, first, developing trust with their counterpart and only then embarking on problem-solving together. This is exactly reverse, they will say, of Americans, who want to get things done and develop trust in the process. President Obama is thus offering a modicum of pre-trust that the Chinese say they need. This is not weakness– it is clever diplomacy.

The Asia itinerary makes clear that China is only one element of U.S.- Asia policy. President Obama is strengthening our traditional alliances in Japan and South Korea, and finally getting the US in the game of multilateral diplomacy in APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation) and ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) on which China has been running the tables over the last eight years.

Ultimately, though, for the new label to match reality, the Chinese need to pony up — on climate, currency, Iran and Afghanistan, among other issues — to help solve these problems, reassure the US that they are indeed willing to act like partners and confirm that the political risk President Obama took in nomenclature was worthwhile. Moreover, tackling each of these threats is in China’s own long-term interests.

If, over time, the Chinese do not cooperate more deeply, then “strategic partnership” could end up just a blip in the historical fluctuations of US-China terminology. But instead I hope that, in a few years, it turns out to be a positive, accurate and highly unremarkable description of our relationship with China.

– Nina Hachigian




It s called “Hat in hand”. America has rack up so much debit to the rest of the world (trillions)that if the other countries wanted to is sub divide the country. America is an Net importer, even to the point of buying paper clips and tooth picks from China.
The Russians who help Iran nuclear program have a habit of leaving a nuclear device (ADM) under the sites they help build. It is a policy that has been going on since Stalin. An insurance policy you might say.


President Obama’s main narrative regarding the Chinese visit is of a candidly unadulterated theme…(Rahm Emanuel) pure tunnel-vision with Iran’s sanctions the administrations top…and only billing,period. Japan’s visit was only to pacify the Japanese Gov’t. Unfortunately,…we will probably pull our entire military presense,(with a small contingency for show only) from the post-war country sometime in the near future,but it will be a stealthy-covert operation so not to alarm the american public that the approx. fifty-thousand troops will be re-routed to Afghanistan. Only time will tell? Finally,when the Obama Administration visits Russia,the same theme (regarding China via Iran)will follow,…getting the Russians to go along on sanctions to Iran ,and of course we will have to negotiate,…better said,sweeten the pot to make it worthwhile for Russia to go along. (Perhaps abandon/pull the missle-defence project the United States has initially implimented)


Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by worldfocus_org: Nina Hachigian writes about the nomenclature of the Obama administration’s emerging relationship with China

Nina Hachigian is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and the co-author of “The Next American Century: How the U.S. Can Thrive as Other Powers Rise.” She has worked on the staff of the National Security Council in the White House and been a senior political scientist at the RAND Corporation. She specializes in U.S.-China relations and great power relationships, multilateral institutions and U.S. foreign policy.

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Produced by Creative News Group LLC     ©2022 WNET.ORG     All rights reserved

Distributed by American Public Television