This website is no longer actively maintained
Some material and features may be unavailable

November 16, 2009
Mourning the loss of life at one of the world’s largest bases

President Obama at the Ft. Hood memorial service. Photo: Flickr user USarmy

Ambassador S. Azmat Hassan is a former Ambassador of Pakistan to Malaysia, Syria and Morocco and Deputy Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations. He is currently an adjunct professor at Seton Hall University and is a contributing Worldfocus blogger.

The implications of Major Nidal Malik Hasan’s rampage at Fort Hood continue to excite public scrutiny. The US is no stranger to deranged individuals of different religious persuasions indulging in mass murder in the past.

President Obama, in a moving eulogy to the dead, cautioned against a rush to judgment. The facts would have to be painstaking pieced together before a fair approximation of what motivated Hasan’s dastardly attack on fellow servicemen can be arrived at.

The fact that Hasan was an Army psychiatrist administering to the post traumatic stress syndrome issues faced by returning Army soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan, added to the puzzling enigma of his act.

It seemed that a healer, trained to mend soldiers broken by the awful physical and psychological traumas inflicted on them by war, had himself cracked under the professional and personal strain he had apparently undergone.

There is little doubt that Hasan had increasingly become a misfit in the Army. Reportedly a loner, he found solace in increasing religiosity. As a Muslim-American, he appeared to be struggling to come to terms with the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

He had publicly declared that he considered America’s involvement in these wars as a war against Islam. He agonized over whether Islam permitted Muslims to fight Muslims in war. It seems these warning signs were not noticed by his superiors who were about to deploy him to Afghanistan.

If the U.S. Army draws the conclusion that its Muslim soldiers are not to be trusted, this would be a big mistake. Most Muslims soldier and officers have fought bravely in Iraq and Afghanistan. Some have given the supreme sacrifice for their country.

Colin Powell personally knew and attested to the valor of one such Muslim officer who died in Afghanistan. He rests in peace in the Arlington cemetery, an acknowledged hero. The acts of one deranged man cannot and should not sway our military leadership. If we succumb to this attitude how can we trust our Iraqi, Afghani, Pakistani and other Muslim allies?

Instead, it would be better to reform Army procedures to catch its misfits in time. Such persons who cannot be nursed back to mental normality should be weeded out.

I cannot end without commenting on the ease with which weapons can be procured in America. In most first world countries this is not the case. There it is very difficult, if not virtually impossible to get a license for lethal weapons.

With stringent gun control imposed here, it might just be possible to avoid putting guns in the hands of alienated individuals who can wreak havoc on innocent citizens. Otherwise we are probably fated to see a repeat of such horrific incidents in the future. Civil society should take the lead in asking for reforms of the current gun laws.

When I served in Malaysia two decades ago, I noticed that it was a crime punishable by death to own an unlicensed revolver. Even owning bullets attracted heavy punishment. Crimes such as the recent rampage are unknown in Malaysia. They are also virtually unknown in Europe, although there are plenty of misfits in these countries.

Think about it.

– Amb. S. Azmat Hassan




S Azmat Hassan. Go back to Pakistan and talk sense to mullahs and talibans and neanderthal tribal warlords. then come back and talk if you are still alive by then


I cann’t believe U when U write that we need more gun control. This was an Army base, guns are allow on military bases. What’s your problem?


I cann’t believe U when U write that we need more gun control. This was an Army base, guns are allow on military ocationd. What’s your problem?


Who gives anyone the right to call anyone a misfit?

The Modern Interpretations of Current Culture?
(I know what philosophical values these interpretations are based upon…evenso:)

Weapons, in and of themselves, are not lethal. They are only lethal…
when misused.

I should know.

I was–23 years ago–responsible for the maintenance and the security along with the general upkeep and accountability of 151 M16’s,
5 M60 Machine guns, 2 50 cal. machine guns, 5 M203 grenade launchers, 151 bayonets (for the rifles), several racks full of 45 cal. pistols and all the ammunition that went along with these weapons when I served 2 years overseas as an Armorer with an Infantry Division in a region that is considered one of the most dangerous regions on Earth…to this day.

Did any of these weapons jump up and attack me?
No. Did I attack anyone with these weapons? No.
And, by the way, I was often alone. Yet, I did not
attack a single Soul. So, don’t unreasonably stereotype anyone by calling people who might be unlike you…misfits. Why?

There are always Exceptions to every rule.

There are many other ways to be qualified with a weapon than to, simply, take them away from everyone….just as there is a requirement to be qualified with a weapon while in basic training and at other times periodically throughout the service.

Rational Thinking is needed…not Extremist
approaches that put innocent civilians at risk.


So we stuggle on with our wounds of his war agianst terror. The level of our ignorance will be measured in the distant future, by those who have the wisdom of experience and history. Our moral failure over the Palestinian occupation will not give the historians any compassion for our wounded prestige.

Facebook Twitter YouTube

Produced by Creative News Group LLC     ©2021 WNET.ORG     All rights reserved

Distributed by American Public Television