Italy lost six of its troops in Afghanistan to a suicide car bombing on Thursday, when two military vehicles were struck by a car filled with explosives. Ten Afghan civilians also died. Italy has about 3,000 troops in Afghanistan, and 21 have now been killed in the war.
Alessandra Baldini, the New York bureau chief of the Italian news agency ANSA, joins Daljit Dhaliwal to discuss how Italians view the war in Afghanistan and the Obama administration.
To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 9
or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.
Worldfocus producer Channtal Fleischfresser translated the following comments posted on the Web site of the Italian daily La Stampa, where there was a vigorous debate over Italy’s role and mission in NATO’s Afghanistan coalition.
Mozart 2006 said:
Six people died? I’m sorry. They are soldiers, they knew they were going to Afghanistan and not to Club Med. They knew what they would earn and what they would risk. They were VOLUNTEERS…. They died. Peace be upon their souls, and condolences to their families. But please, don’t associate me with this “our boys” rhetoric. They are not mine.GC said:
If the Americans had left in 1943 at the first deaths. Hitler would have won. Or Stalin. Today the Taliban would win, and they would not be content only with Afghanistan.MARCO V. said:
What would make the most sense would be to stay, employing an exit strategy… out of what at this point is becoming a senseless conflict: you can’t export democracy.
Oil cannot justify everything.Gianfranco Lepore said:
Bring them home immediately and enough with the so-called “peace missions,” please! We should send these enormous sums of money to earthquake zones or any other cause, and stop calling these poor people who lost their lives martyrs: they were mercenaries and they knew they were risking their lives.…Some 1000 civilians have been killed in Afghanistan since the beginning of the year: no one cares about them!
Elisas said:
There’s not a lot of sense in staying to be targets for the Taliban… At this point it’s better to return home. It’s a senseless mission: you can’t bring democracy to those who don’t want it.





11/15/2009 :: 05:52:46 PM
Joe Says:
Patty…………………
In the main you are correct. How is it fair and reasonable for me to argue that others in my country should fight and somtimes sacrifice their lives for me in a far of country of which we know little of and the reasons given for being there are to say the least suspect. You are correct polititians are remote and their justifications for these military excursions are not always correct or honest. The reluctance of some European countries to participate further stems from limited resources,and rules of engagement that would be contrary to some countries constitutions relating to military activity outside Europe. Notwithstanding the fact that some of these restriction were probably forced on to these European nations after WW2 we still have to tolerate offensive remarks similar to those of Mr Huggins below even in the face of great loss. (By the way Mr Huggins the name you are looking for is GUINNESS)
To cut to the main issue………..For some to call for a withdrawl is taken as a constructive democratic and free opinion based on personal views of the war and for others it is proof of a decades old sterio type that was probably never true in the first place and is now used and raised mainly by people like him below…….Who probably has never been called upon to show the bravery and courage he comments upon of others.