 |
December 22, 2008
Monday, December 22, 2008
Comments
2 comments
#1
The Israeli piece is a very poor one. What are you implying? Killing Palestinians now is no more than a game. The issue is who fires she or he. Your choice of a “killing technology” is appalling to me and to humanity. Questions the international community must ask and your channel must explain. What is Israel doing in Gaza the West Bank the Golan Heights, and the Shiba Farms. It is occupying them by force against international Law and Official American Foreign Policy. The answer is not to humanize Israelis killing of the other. But to show the daily suffering of the people in the Middle East because of Israel’s refusal to adhere to International law, once you show that on equal footing then resistance and Israeli measures will be put in perspective and will not be taken out of context. Israel must be equal to all nations not above the law. The Israeli people must have their security fully preserved, but so should the Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. Israel’s security can not be exercised at the expense of anyone in the region and be justified by many people as self-defense. The argument of self-defense is correct when you defend your own land, not an occupied land
12/27/2008 :: 12:59:56 PM
Jerry Wills II Says:
On Israel: Land is land. Defense is defense. Who among anyone would go to such great lengths to defend a Land which could not considered one’s own? Yet if the effects of spoken and written Languages between parties are not perceived as being causally sufficient as literally or symbolically set forth, the remaining Lines of communications are then left open to vast defensible areas of interpretations in which various means and methods of oversight become necessary beyond the scope of more customary visible geometrical diagrams drawn in the grounds and systems of perpetual diplomacies which often may not, ideographically, be able to, immediately, reach every point on the maps of the current understandings among developed and undeveloped landscapes concerning ongoing internal and external intellectual and spiritual concerns due, at least, in part: to varying issues of perceptually literal borders and ideological boundaries.